A real post-race report

This is not a mock-up. Below is the complete report Navigatek produced for race 2 of 12 September 2026 on Lake Tremblant, aboard CAN157 — every figure computed by deterministic tools from the boat's own sensors.

Two things have been changed, and only two: the internal component names have been shortened, and the other boats in the fleet have been renumbered. Nothing else has been touched — not a figure, not a verdict, not a limitation. A report that only showed what went well would be worth nothing.

Race 2 — 15:02:10 → 15:41:01 (38.9 min)

Start

9.1/10

Speed

5.9/10

Manoeuvres

0.0/10

Tactics

—/10

AI coaching

4.0/10

1 · Summary

Speed breakdown at 15:37: 96.3 % of polar for 20 min, then 75.9 % for 4 min WITH NO RECOVERY — that is 1.15 kt and 142 m (65 s) lost. A drop that never repairs itself is not a bad minute: look for a brake (sheet in the water, weed on the keel or rudder, badly tensioned kite) rather than a steering error. 7 anomalies out of 22 checks on the coaching stream, including 148.2 s lost at 15:28:03 to messages queued late. The served wind jumps 42° at every tack: that is a sensor error, not the wind.

How to read the marks. Each mark is a reading point, not a verdict: it compares a measured quantity against an absolute scale, written in advance and identical from one race to the next. A dimension without a measurement is worth « — » and not zero.

Speed · 5.9/10: the share of the J/70's theoretical speed the boat actually held, at this wind and this angle. Measured 93.2 %, that is 4.1 point(s) below the maximum. 11.8 % short of 10/10, and each point is worth 2.9 %.
Scale: 105 % is 10/10, 85 % is 3/10.
Manoeuvres · 0/10: the mean loss per manoeuvre, tacks and gybes together. Measured 25.6 s, that is 10 point(s) below the maximum. 21.6 s short of 10/10, and each point is worth 1.6 s.
Scale: 4 s is 10/10, 15 s is 3/10.
Start · 9.1/10: Mean speed 5.6 kt, with a mean polar percentage of 93.2%. Notable asymmetry between starboard (87.1%) and port (79.4%) upwind. Measured 4.7 s, that is 0.9 point(s) below the maximum. 2.7 s short of 10/10, and each point is worth 2.9 s.
Scale: 2 s is 10/10, 25 s is 2/10.
Tactics · —/10: the overcost of the route sailed compared with the best route possible in the day's wind. Not measured on this race: the mark is not a zero, it does not exist.
Scale: 3 % is 10/10, 25 % is 2/10.
AI coaching · 4/10: wind 154.1° · tacking angle 68.6° · 7 tacks · corridor 55.2 %, pinched 15.2 %, footed 29.6 % Average of two halves — shift accuracy 18.8 % → 0.5/10 and absence of duplicates 9.0 % → 7.6/10. A coach who is right but never stops talking and a silent coach are equally unusable.
Scale: shift accuracy: 90 % is 10/10, 30 % is 2/10 · absence of duplicates: 2 % is 10/10, 25 % is 2/10.

Speed breakdown(s) detected — a step measured in the speed, invisible in an average:

15:37 upwind: speed falls from 96.3 % to 75.9 % of polar, that is 65 s lost (142 m)

2 · Context and conditions

Mean wind

10.9 kt

Direction

164.5°

circular mean of the served wind over the race (sect…

p90 gusts

13.8 kt

Max

18.5 kt

Direction amplitude

49.8°

p5 to p95 — how far the wind SWEPT (section 7)

Net drift

-0° (-0 °/h)

from start to finish — this is NOT the amplitude

Oscillation (20 m segments)

18.9°

Period

169 s

Calibrated heading

yes

Sensor health

sensor	state	valid frames	readings	gaps
forward GPS	ok	100 %	34007	25 >0.3 s
aft GPS	absent	0 %	0	n/d
Calypso wind	ok	100 %	1573	0 >4.5 s
compass	ok	100 %	2324	0 >3 s
gyroscope	ok	100 %	2324	0 >3 s
barometer	forecast (weather) — no local measurement	100 %	232	0 >30 s
speaker	ok	100 %	209	n/d >3 s

A 38.9-minute race in a southerly wind (164.5° on average, 5.5 to 18.5 kt). The wind turns 0.3° per hour, with 18.9° oscillations every 169 s. The aft GPS supplied no data.

reliability mean
· aft GPS sensor: no data over the race

3 · Start

Seconds lost

4.7 s

Line bias

45.9°

Position at the gun

0.7

Distance to the line at the gun

39.4 m

behind the line

the seconds lost at the gun, counted from the race committee's gun and not from crossing the line.

reliability high
· start measured from the race committee's GUN (start 2 gun of Race 2026-09-12 14:51), -53 s relative to the race boundary

4 · Speed and polars

Mean polar %

93.2 %

Median

87.8 %

Time below 90 %

26.3 %

Max SOG

9.6 kt

Max upwind

6.2 kt

Max downwind

9.6 kt

Mean SOG

5.6 kt

Legs analysed

An angle followed by a * is MEASURED (speed triangle, from the apparent wind): the reference wind gave a geometrically impossible one on this leg.

Leg detail — absolute and target speed

leg	duration	TWA	wind	Mean SOG	Max SOG	polar target	% polar
downwind port	692.7 s	153.9°	11.4 kt	6.5 kt	9.6 kt	6 kt	106.9 %
downwind starboard	99.1 s	177.8°	10.3 kt	5.5 kt	6.4 kt	5 kt	111.7 %
reaching port	170.8 s	121.7°*	11 kt	5.6 kt	6.3 kt	7.3 kt	76.8 %
upwind starboard	702.4 s	43.6°*	10.9 kt	5.4 kt	6 kt	5.8 kt	92.4 %
upwind port	134.1 s	41.2°*	10.9 kt	5.3 kt	5.8 kt	5.7 kt	93.7 %
upwind starboard	75.9 s	45.7°*	11.4 kt	5.4 kt	6.1 kt	6 kt	90.1 %
upwind port	54.5 s	37.7°	11.7 kt	4.8 kt	5.3 kt	5.8 kt	84.1 %
upwind port	122.6 s	44.9°*	11.2 kt	5.1 kt	6.2 kt	6 kt	85.6 %
upwind starboard	154.1 s	55.2°*	9.6 kt	4.8 kt	5.7 kt	6.1 kt	78.7 %
upwind port	105.1 s	57.4°*	9.5 kt	3.3 kt	4.5 kt	6.1 kt	54.2 %

Tack asymmetry

point of sail / tack	% polar	n legs	std dev
upwind_starboard	87.1 %	3	6.0
upwind_port	79.4 %	4	15.0
downwind_starboard	111.7 %	1	n/d
downwind_port	106.9 %	1	n/d

upwind_delta_starboard_minus_port: 7.7 pts

downwind_delta_starboard_minus_port: 4.8 pts

Start 52.7 s late, line crossed at 3.7 kt instead of the expected 4.8 kt. The line was biased 45.9° to the east.

reliability high
· polar percentage is computed on SOG (speed over ground): the boat has no paddle wheel, leeway and current are not removed
What the engine gives as a reason, branch by branch:

5 · Manoeuvres

Total

Tacks

Gybes

Total loss

97.2 s

% of time

4.2 %

Median duration

3 s

rotation time: median 3 s · from 2 s to 8 s · timed on 5 manoeuvres out of 10

1 announced — a trend seen, not enough to bet on

tack: mean loss 23 s · worst 27 s · best 21 s (n=3) — rotation 3 s (2–8 s, n=4)

gybe: mean loss 28.2 s · worst 28.2 s · best 28.2 s (n=1) — rotation 5 s (5–5 s, n=1)

time	type	wind	rotation	loss
15:02:30	gybe	9.6 kt	not measured	28.2 s
15:15:42	gybe	9.3 kt	5 s	n/d
15:17:23	gybe	n/d	not measured	0.3 s
15:18:32	tack	10.4 kt	unstable heading	22 s
15:30:15	tack	12.4 kt	3 s	28.1 s
15:32:29	tack	11.4 kt	not measured	21 s
15:33:45	tack	10.5 kt	2 s	n/d
15:34:40	tack	12 kt	3 s	21 s
15:36:42	tack	9.3 kt	unstable heading	27 s
15:39:17	tack	9.3 kt	8 s	n/d

Point-of-sail transitions — 0 s not counted

Rotation below the threshold of a manoeuvre. Time is lost there all the same, but these are neither tacks nor gybes: they count neither in the total nor in the mean cost.

time	type	wind	loss	reason
15:14:02	transition — gybe	9.8 kt	n/d	cycles where the engine asked to tack or gybe…

7 tacks and 3 gybes, for a total loss of 97.2 s (4.2% of race time). The worst tack cost 27.0 s.

reliability mean
· 1 point-of-sail transition(s) (rotation below the 45° threshold) excluded from the manoeuvre counts: 0.0 s are lost there, listed separately
· 3 loss(es) set aside from the averages: timed from an instant when the manoeuvre had not begun (gap of 71 s, 24 s, 39 s)
· 6 manoeuvre(s) not assessable (wind < 3.0 kt or loss not measured)

5bis · Leeway and symmetries

Starboard: median 7.1° · mean 9.2° · p10 -2.4° / p90 24.6° (n=1165)

Port: median -4.8° · mean -5.3° · p10 -11.1° / p90 0.8° (n=1150)

True leeway 5.9° — compass offset 1.1° (expected range 3° to 6°)

Heel: starboard -11.5° · port 4.1° → true heel 7.8°, sensor offset -3.7°

Upwind: median absolute leeway 8.8° (n=1135)

Reaching: median absolute leeway 4° (n=215)

Downwind: median absolute leeway 4.6° (n=774)

True leeway of 5.9°, with a compass offset of 1.1°. Suspect heel offset of -3.7°.

reliability high
over 52 comparisons FROM THIS RACE only (resets every outing) — the trial setting stayed at 0 for the whole race, this changed nothing in what was served

5ter · The track on the lake

Generated 2026-09-14 08:37 · figures produced by deterministic tools, JSON per race in

reliability high

6 · Upwind and downwind — angles, speeds, heel

UPWIND

Legs

Mean TWA

46.5°

Gap to 42° target

4.5°

Pointing

too footed

mean of the 7 upwind legs, target 42°

On the water, the coaching stayed SILENT on this leg: its dead band is 6° (anti-chatter), the report judges at 3°. Both are right — the gap costs VMG without deserving to be spoken about during a race.

Mean SOG

4.9 kt

Max SOG

6.2 kt

% polar

82.6 %

Mean heel

13.1°

Max heel

37.4°

Time > 20°

21 %

Time spent by heel band

heel	% of time	distribution
0-5°	16.8 %
5-10°	20.6 %
10-15°	23.6 %
15-20°	18 %
20-25°	13.3 %
25+°	7.7 %

By tack

tack	legs	TWA	SOG	% polar	heel
starboard	3	48.2°	5.2 kt	87.1 %	12.1°
port	4	45.3°	4.6 kt	79.3 %	13.3°

DOWNWIND

Legs

Mean TWA

168.8°

TWA min-max

153.9–177.8°

Mean SOG

5.3 kt

Max SOG

9.6 kt

% polar

103.6 %

Mean heel

3.1°

Max heel

18.6°

Time > 20°

0 %

Time spent by heel band

heel	% of time	distribution
0-5°	80.1 %
5-10°	17.8 %
10-15°	1.7 %
15-20°	0.4 %

By tack

tack	legs	TWA	SOG	% polar	heel
starboard	2	176.2°	4.7 kt	102 %	2°
port	1	153.9°	6.5 kt	106.9 %	3.2°

Upwind, 7 legs with a mean TWA of 46.5°, mean speed 4.9 kt and mean heel 13.1°. Downwind, 3 legs with a mean TWA of 168.8°, mean speed 5.3 kt and mean heel 3.1°. Speed breakdown at 15:37: 96.3 % of polar for 20 min, then 75.9 % for 4 min WITH NO RECOVERY — that is 1.15 kt and 142 m (65 s) lost.

reliability high
· SUSPECT ANGLES: 5 leg(s) publish a TWA LOWER than the measured apparent angle (e.g. 15:18:33: TWA 31.2° for an AWA of 39.5°). Upwind this is geometrically impossible — the apparent wind draws forward. The reference wind is wrong, not the steering: do not judge pointing on this race.
· 6 upwind legs out of 7 carry a MEASURED angle (speed triangle, from the apparent wind) rather than one computed against the race wind: that one gave a value below the apparent, therefore geometrically impossible. These angles are marked with a * in the tables. They do not compare with the tacking angle — the measured angle does not close up when you tack on a header.
· Once upwind, two consecutive legs are on the SAME tack (port): NO tack separates them — the heading turned without changing tack (a luff or a bear-away). Tack is taken from the sign of the MEASURED apparent wind, never deduced from the true wind.
· 1 tack(s) out of 5 taken on a LIFT: the angle turned there exceeds 2×TWA, so the wind had shifted in your favour and tacking gave it back. Example: 15:36:43, 124° turned for -31° of shift.
Our timing and the race committee's DISAGREE: 2384 s against 2196.3 s, that is
· 1 reaching leg out of 1 carries a MEASURED angle (speed triangle, from the apparent wind) rather than one computed against the race wind: that one gave a value below the apparent, therefore geometrically impossible. These angles are marked with a * in the tables. They do not compare with the tacking angle — the measured angle does not close up when you tack on a header.
· 1 downwind leg out of 3 carries a MEASURED angle (speed triangle, from the apparent wind) rather than one computed against the race wind: that one gave a value below the apparent, therefore geometrically impossible. These angles are marked with a * in the tables. They do not compare with the tacking angle — the measured angle does not close up when you tack on a header.
· SPEED BREAKDOWN upwind around 15:37: 96.3 % of polar for 20 min, then 75.9 % for 4 min WITH NO RECOVERY — that is 1.15 kt and 142 m (65 s) lost. A drop that never repairs itself is not a bad minute: look for a brake (sheet in the water, weed on the keel or rudder, badly tensioned kite) rather than a steering error.

7 · The wind — shifts, headers and lifts

Mean TWD

164.5°

circular mean of the served wind — the reference va…

Direction amplitude

49.8°

p5 to p95 over the whole race — how far the wind…

Net drift

-0° (-0 °/h)

from start to finish — this is NOT the amplitude

Strength

10.9 kt

Strength — trend

-1.0 kt (-1.6 kt/h)

Shifts

rotation >= 5 deg over a 60 s window of the served…

Headers

Lifts

Mean header

8°

Largest header

11.1°

The wind swept 50° to drift only -0° from start to finish: it oscillated, it did not turn. In that regime the gain is in tacking on the headers, not in choosing a side.

prevailing wind 165° (South) · 10.2 kt · 45 cells measured, 22 filled from the atlas, 119 interpolated · source: wind served on board (the boat's sensors, calibrated compass)

The shifts, one by one

time	rotation	direction	tack	nature
15:04:50	-6.4°	left	port	lift
15:07:20	-6°	left	port	lift
15:09:30	8.6°	right	port	header
15:11:20	-7.2°	left	port	lift
15:12:50	-16.5°	left	port	lift
15:15:20	7.1°	right	starboard	lift
15:17:30	-9.5°	left	port	lift
15:19:20	5.4°	right	starboard	lift
15:21:30	5.3°	right	starboard	lift
15:23:40	-6.7°	left	starboard	header
15:25:30	5.7°	right	starboard	lift
15:28:20	5.2°	right	starboard	lift
15:29:50	-11.1°	left	starboard	header
15:32:00	10.3°	right	port	header
15:34:10	-6.2°	left	starboard	header
15:35:40	9.2°	right	starboard	lift
15:37:10	-7.8°	left	starboard	header
15:39:20	5.2°	right	port	header

Southerly wind, turning 0.3° per hour. 18 shifts detected, 7 headers and 11 lifts. The largest header measured is 11.1°.

reliability high

8 · Tactics

Overcost

—

closed course: not computable, see the distance sai…

Distance sailed

6708 m

maturity: coaching cycles (~40 s) where the tactical e…

Missed shifts

true length of the GPS track, from the gun to the finish

Plan B — the bet on the racecourse

Cycles observed

maturity: over how many coaching cycles (~40 s)…

Bets (signal)

1 announced — a trend seen, not enough to bet…

Bets announced

heading change of only 37°: not a manoeuvre

Watches

shifts detectable after the fact that no announcem…

Predicted wind accuracy

44.8 %

Wind, 29 usable evaluation(s) out of 53 — th…

Model vs persistence

0 %

over 200 comparisons accumulated by Wind sin…

Narrowing (shadow trial)

would have lost

over 52 comparisons FROM THIS RACE only (resets…

When the module stays silent, why:

not enough observations: 20
rotation >= 5 deg over a 60 s window of the served wind
other: 11
0 % of observed cycles — the rest is deliberate sil…
gain too small or side not yet stable: 3

Observed fault — to follow for improving the AI coaching

The wind module's safeguard serves SIMPLE PERSISTENCE, not the wind model: over 200 comparisons accumulated since 22 August 2026, the model beats persistence only 0.0 % of the time — DOWN since the safeguard was deployed (26.9 % on 22 August 2026). A signal to follow for improving the AI coaching — see the workbook, « wind-model-regressing-vs-persistence ».

high « signal » = what the module saw at every coaching cycle (~40 s), including its silence; « announced » = what actually reached the skipper, after the anti-repeat delay. A call that never leaves the signal is not a fault: it is the module's normal mode (silent by default, see the « water » module). `coverage_reliability` qualifies the NUMBER OF CYCLES OBSERVED, not the quality of the calls themselves: a day without a single call remains a reliable measurement if the module ran on every cycle.

Plan C — the measured header

Upwind cycles

p5 to p95 over the whole race — how far the wind SWEPT

Reco (signal)

6.2 % of upwind cycles

Orders announced

usable tactical windows (a shift seen from…

Follow-through

50 %

on 2 verifiable order(s): did the heading change…

Why the signal fires:

Collapsed or negative VMG (haemorrhage): 2

high « signal » = every coaching cycle (~40 s) where the boat is upwind (the tactical engine runs); « announced » = the orders actually spoken, prefixed « Plan C » (see the internal documentation). Critical alerts (collapsed or negative VMG) skip the orchestrator's usual confirmation — that is deliberate, a haemorrhage cannot wait. `coverage_reliability` qualifies the NUMBER OF UPWIND CYCLES OBSERVED, not the frequency of the orders.

Where the « now » orders come from

Orders

including 2 critical alert(s) (collapsed or negat…

Shortest clear water

110 m

on orders triggered by the SHORE — this is the fi…

unstable heading around the manoeuvre (spread 30° > 25°)

10 (90.9 %) — the other tack reaches the mark sooner
1 (9.1 %) — safety — not enough clear water ahead

Clear water left on these shore orders: 110 m. A shore order is not a tactical choice, it is safety — it is not judged on gain.

16 shifts detected, only 1 exploited (6.2%). The follow-through rate on announcements is 73.0%.

reliability high
· closed course (start ≈ finish): route overcost cannot be computed on net distance
· « exploited » = a manoeuvre within 60 s; the DIRECTION of the shift and the starting tack are not yet taken into account — a low rate does not mean as many missed opportunities
· shift threshold 5° on wind smoothed over 60 s: at Tremblant the water's own oscillation is of the same order

9 · AI coaching audit

Announcements

122

Per minute

3.1

Duplicates

9 %

Shift accuracy

18.8 %

on 16 shift announcement(s) verifiable in the str…

Crew follow-through

73 %

Missed

what actually reached the skipper, after the cool…

other 41 · speed_course 44 · shift 18 · manoeuvre 7 · gust 11 · plan_b 1

Detectable shifts not announced

time	extent
15:02:10	9.4°
15:03:10	-7°
15:04:10	-14.2°
15:23:10	-5.1°
15:24:10	9.8°
15:25:10	11.6°
15:31:10	26.3°
15:32:10	8.2°
15:34:10	14°
15:36:10	-11.6°
15:37:10	-5.8°

Stream audit — 22 automatic checks

Anomalies

Checks

Cycles examined

136

Messages examined

code	what it means	n	cost	where to look
C7	The voice queue backs up — a message waits for the previous one to end	1	148 s	Orchestrator — announcement cadence
C8	A manoeuvre order leaves by the channel that does not jump the queue	2	16 s	Orchestrator — voice queue
C3	A steering instruction while the boat is crossing the wind	2	6 s	Orchestrator — turn guard
D2	terrain and wind shift confounded (single leg): 9	1	5 s	boat sensors — manoeuvre detector
A3	not timed: 5 × unstable heading during the rotation	1	2 s	Orchestrator — anti-repeat

what the coaching BRINGS (shift accuracy) minus what it COSTS in attention (duplicates).

3 lower-cost anomaly(ies) counted but not detailed here — they all appear in the audit document.

The COMPLETE list, with the time and file of every anomaly, is sent from the on-board interface via the « AI coaching » button.

7 anomalies out of 22 checks, including 148.2 s lost at 15:28:03 to messages queued late. The served wind jumps 42° at every tack: that is a sensor error, not the wind.

reliability high
· THE SERVED WIND JUMPS 42° AT EVERY TACK (7 tacks measured). Wind does not turn 42° in ten seconds: this is an error that changes sign with the tack, so the compass or the vane. Any shift announced just after a tack describes this fault, not the wind — and that is what explains so low an accuracy rate. A gap measured from one tack to the other is NOT a shift.
· STREAM AUDIT: 7 anomalies out of 22 checks, 136 cycles examined. The costliest: C7 15:28:03 19 message(s) out of 88 leave the queue late (worst estimated: 16 s) · C8 15:15:18 1 manoeuvre order sent from a non-priority channel (cycle) — · C8 15:32:35 2 order(s) spoken TWICE in the same second by two channels (Plan C

10 · Fleet

CAN157

2 of 5 · 36:36.3 · +14 s off the leader

Rank	Boat	Time	Gap to 1st	Start gp.	Status
1	CAN101	36:21.7	+0 s	2	FIN
2	CAN157	36:36.3	+14 s	2	FIN
3	CAN102	37:36.3	+74 s	2	FIN
4	CAN103	38:26.4	+124 s	2	FIN
5	CAN104	41:52.6	+331 s	1	FIN

Source: the race committee · race « Race 2026-09-12 14:51 ».

Checks PASSED — nothing to report: A1, A2, A4, A5, B1, B2, B4, B5, B6, C1, C2, C4, D3, D4, D5 +187.7 s (threshold 3 s). method

11 · Progress

Over the last 10 races analysed.

Indicator	First	Latest	Gap	Per race	Trend
Start — seconds lost	9.1 s	4.7 s	-4.4 s	-0.662 s	▼ progress
Mean cost of a tack	6.8 s	23.0 s	+16.2 s	+1.508 s	▲ decline
Speed — % of polar	96.8 %	93.2 %	-3.6 % ≠	+0.468 %	▲ progress
Coaching — accuracy rate	20.0 %	18.8 %	-1.2 %	-0.217 %	▼ decline

Not yet enough points for: Tactical overcost.

11bis · The leg close up

Segmentation at 20 m : 308 segments of 6 s median · 140 upwind, 113 downwind

Wind: median of the segments 164.5° · amplitude 61.7° over the race

Upwind VMG: median 4.2 kt · p10 3.4 kt / p90 4.7 kt · spread 0.6 kt

Downwind VMG: median 4.6 kt · p10 3.9 kt / p90 5.5 kt · spread 0.6 kt rate of descent

Downwind, the weakest quarter (28 segments): VMG 4 kt at 128.2° of TWA for 6.3 kt.

The weakest quarter (35 segments): VMG 3.5 kt at 46.5° of TWA for 5.1 kt — this is where time is lost.

reliability high

12 · Crew decisions

Two measurements of the same upwind: 46.5° as a mean over legs (section 6) against 42.2° as a median over 20 m segments. The 4.3° gap comes from the segmentation: a few long legs weigh as much as hundreds of short segments. The pointing verdict is delivered once only, in section 6.

Median upwind TWA 42.2° for a target of 42° (0.2°) · spread 8° (n=478)

Gust response: over 24 gusts upwind (base wind 10.8 kt), heel gains 5.2° more 6.5 s later — peak at 37.4°. definition

TWS is derived from the apparent wind: on zero-delay events, heel may have manufactured the gust rather than suffered it (6 out of 24).

No decision fault recorded on this race.

Not attributable to the crew

34° of header held for 267 s on starboard without tacking — but the coaching did NOT say to tack: this is an opportunity missed by the system, not by the crew

16° of header held for 27 s on starboard without tacking — but the coaching did NOT say to tack: this is an opportunity missed by the system, not by the crew

38° of header held for 43 s on port without tacking — but the coaching did NOT say to tack: this is an opportunity missed by the system, not by the crew

No fault recorded. 3 missed opportunities to tack on a header, but the coaching did not recommend tacking.

reliability high

Action plan

closed course: not computable, see the distance sailed

C8 anomalies: today 2

target: 0

16.0 s cumulated over the race

Fix the C3 anomalies — orchestrator — turn guard

C3 anomalies: today 2

target: 0

6.0 s cumulated over the race

Recover target speed

% of polar (weighted by duration): today 93.2%

target: 95%

· heel above 20° upwind for 21.0 % of the time: beyond 20° a J/70 slides without gaining one data file per race.

Back to the site